Echelon Institute logo
Echelon Institute
Canadian Water & Wastewater
๐Ÿ  Home
๐Ÿ“ OIT Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ OIT Mock Exam
๐Ÿ’ง C1 Water Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ C1 Water Mock
๐Ÿ“ C1 Water Formulas
๐Ÿ’ง C2 Water Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ C2 Water Mock
๐Ÿ“ C2 Water Formulas
๐Ÿฆ  C1 WW Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ C1 WW Mock
๐Ÿ“ C1 WW Formulas
โ™ป๏ธ C2 WW Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ C2 WW Mock
๐Ÿ“ C2 WW Formulas
๐Ÿ’ง C3 Water Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ C3 Water Mock
๐Ÿ“ C3 Water Formulas
๐Ÿ’ง C4 Water Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ C4 Water Mock
๐Ÿ“ C4 Water Formulas
๐Ÿญ C3 WW Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ C3 WW Mock
๐Ÿ“ C3 WW Formulas
๐Ÿญ C4 WW Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ C4 WW Mock
๐Ÿ“ C4 WW Formulas
๐Ÿงช WQA Practice
๐Ÿ”ฌ WQA Mock Exam
๐Ÿ“ WQA Formulas
๐ŸŒŠ WPI โ€” BC / AB / SK / MB
๐ŸŒŠ WPI C1 Water Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ WPI C1 Water Mock
๐Ÿ“ WPI C1 Water Formulas
๐ŸŒŠ WPI C2 Water Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ WPI C2 Water Mock
๐Ÿ“ WPI C2 Water Formulas
๐ŸŒŠ WPI C3 Water Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ WPI C3 Water Mock
๐Ÿ“ WPI C3 Water Formulas
๐ŸŒŠ WPI C4 Water Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ WPI C4 Water Mock
๐Ÿ“ WPI C4 Water Formulas
๐ŸŒŠ WPI C1 WW Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ WPI C1 WW Mock
๐Ÿ“ WPI C1 WW Formulas
๐ŸŒŠ WPI C2 WW Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ WPI C2 WW Mock
๐Ÿ“ WPI C2 WW Formulas
๐ŸŒŠ WPI C3 WW Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ WPI C3 WW Mock
๐Ÿ“ WPI C3 WW Formulas
๐Ÿ›๏ธ WPI C4 WW Practice
๐Ÿ“‹ WPI C4 WW Mock
๐Ÿ“ WPI C4 WW Formulas
๐ŸŒŠ WPI Overview
๐Ÿ“ Formulas
๐Ÿญ Process Guide
โ™ป๏ธ Wastewater
โš™๏ธ Pumping
๐Ÿงฎ Math Practice
๐Ÿงช Chem Calc
๐Ÿ”ฌ Lab
๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Career Map
๐Ÿ“‹ Mock Exam
โ„น๏ธ About
๐ŸŽซ My Passes
Echelon Institute

Class 3 Water Treatment Formula Sheet

35 formulas ยท Application-level calculations ยท ABC/WPI NTK aligned

โš—๏ธ

Treatment Process

11 formulas
Langelier Saturation Index (LSI)
Units: dimensionless
LSI = pH โˆ’ pHs
Variables
โ€ข pH = measured pH of water
โ€ข pHs = pH at which water is saturated with CaCOโ‚ƒ
โ€ข pHs = (pKโ‚‚ โˆ’ pKs) + p[Caยฒโบ] + p[HCOโ‚ƒโป]
โ€ข LSI > 0: scale-forming (CaCOโ‚ƒ deposits)
โ€ข LSI < 0: corrosive (dissolves CaCOโ‚ƒ scale)
โ€ข LSI = 0: balanced
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
pH = 7.8, pHs = 8.2 โ†’ LSI = 7.8 โˆ’ 8.2 = โˆ’0.4 (slightly corrosive)
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Class 3 exams test pHs calculation from temperature, calcium, and alkalinity. Know that LSI < โˆ’0.5 requires corrosion control treatment.
Chlorine Demand
Units: mg/L
Demand = Applied Dose โˆ’ Residual
Variables
โ€ข Applied Dose = chlorine added (mg/L)
โ€ข Residual = free or total chlorine remaining after contact time (mg/L)
โ€ข Demand = consumed by organics, ammonia, metals, etc.
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Applied 3.5 mg/L, residual 1.2 mg/L โ†’ Demand = 3.5 โˆ’ 1.2 = 2.3 mg/L
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Breakpoint chlorination requires ~10ร— the ammonia-N concentration to reach the breakpoint and achieve free chlorine residual.
CT Value (Disinfection)
Units: mgยทmin/L
CT = C ร— T
Variables
โ€ข C = disinfectant residual concentration (mg/L)
โ€ข T = contact time (minutes) โ€” typically Tโ‚โ‚€ (10th percentile)
โ€ข CT required depends on pathogen, disinfectant, pH, temperature
โ€ข Higher CT = more disinfection credit
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
C = 1.5 mg/L free Clโ‚‚, Tโ‚โ‚€ = 30 min โ†’ CT = 45 mgยทmin/L
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
For Giardia: 3-log inactivation requires CT โ‰ˆ 73 mgยทmin/L at 15ยฐC, pH 7. For Cryptosporidium: chlorine is ineffective; UV or ozone required.
Coagulant Dose (Jar Test)
Units: mg/L
Dose (mg/L) = (Volume of coagulant stock ร— Concentration of stock) / Volume of sample
Variables
โ€ข Volume of coagulant stock = mL added to jar
โ€ข Concentration of stock = mg/mL (or g/L)
โ€ข Volume of sample = typically 1,000 mL (1 L)
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Add 1.5 mL of 10,000 mg/L alum to 1,000 mL sample โ†’ Dose = (1.5 ร— 10,000) / 1,000 = 15 mg/L
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Jar test results must be scaled to plant flow for actual chemical feed rate. Optimal pH for alum coagulation is 6.5โ€“7.5.
Chemical Feed Rate
Units: kg/day
Feed Rate (kg/day) = Flow (ML/day) ร— Dose (mg/L)
Variables
โ€ข Flow = plant flow rate in megalitres per day (ML/day)
โ€ข Dose = chemical dose in mg/L
โ€ข 1 ML/day ร— 1 mg/L = 1 kg/day
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Flow = 25 ML/day, alum dose = 18 mg/L โ†’ Feed Rate = 25 ร— 18 = 450 kg/day
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
This is the most common Class 3 calculation. Memorize: ML/day ร— mg/L = kg/day. Convert mยณ/s to ML/day: ร— 86.4
Fluoride Dose Calculation
Units: L/day
Volume of fluoride solution = (Target โˆ’ Current) ร— Plant Flow / (Fluoride concentration ร— Purity)
Variables
โ€ข Target = desired fluoride concentration (mg/L), typically 0.7 mg/L
โ€ข Current = existing fluoride in source water (mg/L)
โ€ข Plant Flow = ML/day
โ€ข Fluoride concentration = mg/L in stock solution
โ€ข Purity = fraction (e.g., 0.98 for 98% pure NaF)
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Target 0.7 mg/L, current 0.1 mg/L, flow 10 ML/day, 10,000 mg/L NaF stock, 98% purity โ†’ Volume = (0.7โˆ’0.1) ร— 10,000,000 / (10,000 ร— 0.98) = 612 L/day
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Fluoride calculations appear frequently at Class 3. Know the three fluoride chemicals: NaF (sodium fluoride), Naโ‚‚SiFโ‚† (sodium fluorosilicate), Hโ‚‚SiFโ‚† (fluorosilicic acid).
Lime Dose for Softening
Units: mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ
Lime dose (mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ) = COโ‚‚ + Carbonate Hardness + Mg hardness (if removing Mg)
Variables
โ€ข COโ‚‚ removal: COโ‚‚ (mg/L) ร— 2.27 = lime dose (mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ)
โ€ข Carbonate hardness removal: 1 mg/L CaCOโ‚ƒ hardness requires 1 mg/L lime (as CaCOโ‚ƒ)
โ€ข Mg removal: 1 mg/L Mg hardness requires 1 mg/L lime (as CaCOโ‚ƒ) extra
โ€ข Actual lime = lime dose (as CaCOโ‚ƒ) ร— 0.74 (converts to Ca(OH)โ‚‚)
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
COโ‚‚ = 20 mg/L, carbonate hardness = 150 mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ โ†’ Lime = (20 ร— 2.27 + 150) ร— 0.74 = 145 mg/L Ca(OH)โ‚‚
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Soda ash (Naโ‚‚COโ‚ƒ) is needed for non-carbonate hardness removal: 1 mg/L NCH requires 1.06 mg/L soda ash (as CaCOโ‚ƒ).
Filter Loading Rate
Units: m/h (or gal/min/ftยฒ)
Loading Rate (m/h) = Flow (mยณ/h) / Filter Area (mยฒ)
Variables
โ€ข Flow = total flow through the filter (mยณ/h)
โ€ข Filter Area = plan area of filter media (mยฒ)
โ€ข Typical design rate: 5โ€“15 m/h for rapid sand filters
โ€ข Maximum rate: 15โ€“20 m/h (check turbidity at high rates)
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Flow = 500 mยณ/h, filter area = 50 mยฒ โ†’ Loading Rate = 500/50 = 10 m/h
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Filter loading rate affects turbidity removal. Rates above 15 m/h may cause turbidity breakthrough. Reduce rate when source water turbidity is high.
Backwash Rate
Units: m/h
Backwash Rate (m/h) = Backwash Flow (mยณ/h) / Filter Area (mยฒ)
Variables
โ€ข Backwash Flow = flow rate during backwash (mยณ/h)
โ€ข Filter Area = plan area of filter (mยฒ)
โ€ข Typical backwash rate: 36โ€“60 m/h (10โ€“15 gal/min/ftยฒ)
โ€ข Target: 20โ€“30% bed expansion
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Backwash flow = 2,000 mยณ/h, filter area = 50 mยฒ โ†’ Backwash Rate = 2,000/50 = 40 m/h
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Insufficient backwash rate leaves mud balls in the media. Excessive rate washes out fine media. Backwash water volume = 2โ€“5% of filtered water production.
UV Dose (Fluence)
Units: mJ/cmยฒ
UV Dose (mJ/cmยฒ) = UV Intensity (mW/cmยฒ) ร— Contact Time (s)
Variables
โ€ข UV Intensity = measured at the sensor (mW/cmยฒ)
โ€ข Contact Time = hydraulic residence time in UV reactor (s)
โ€ข Dose โ‰ฅ 40 mJ/cmยฒ for 4-log Cryptosporidium inactivation
โ€ข Dose โ‰ฅ 186 mJ/cmยฒ for 4-log Giardia inactivation (UV less effective)
โ€ข Dose โ‰ฅ 40 mJ/cmยฒ for 4-log virus inactivation (with 254 nm)
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Intensity = 20 mW/cmยฒ, contact time = 5 s โ†’ UV Dose = 20 ร— 5 = 100 mJ/cmยฒ
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
UV dose is reduced by turbidity and UVT (UV transmittance). Always use validated dose-response curves. UV does not provide residual disinfection.
Ozone CT
Units: mgยทmin/L
Ozone CT (mgยทmin/L) = Ozone Residual (mg/L) ร— Contact Time (min)
Variables
โ€ข Ozone Residual = dissolved ozone concentration (mg/L)
โ€ข Contact Time = Tโ‚โ‚€ in ozone contactor (min)
โ€ข CT for 3-log Giardia inactivation: 0.5โ€“1.0 mgยทmin/L at pH 7, 15ยฐC
โ€ข CT for 3-log Cryptosporidium: 5โ€“10 mgยทmin/L
โ€ข Ozone decomposes rapidly; residual must be measured at contactor outlet
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Ozone residual = 0.4 mg/L, Tโ‚โ‚€ = 4 min โ†’ CT = 0.4 ร— 4 = 1.6 mgยทmin/L
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Ozone CT is much lower than chlorine CT for Giardia/Crypto. Ozone also oxidizes taste/odour compounds and NOM. Bromate formation is a concern with bromide-containing source water.
๐Ÿ”ฌ

Laboratory Analysis

7 formulas
Turbidity Removal (Log Credit)
Units: log units
Log Removal = logโ‚โ‚€(Influent Turbidity / Effluent Turbidity)
Variables
โ€ข Influent Turbidity = raw water or settled water turbidity (NTU)
โ€ข Effluent Turbidity = filtered water turbidity (NTU)
โ€ข 2-log removal = 99% removal
โ€ข 3-log removal = 99.9% removal
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Influent = 50 NTU, Effluent = 0.05 NTU โ†’ Log Removal = log(50/0.05) = log(1000) = 3.0 log
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Ontario requires filtered water turbidity โ‰ค 0.3 NTU (95th percentile) and โ‰ค 1.0 NTU at all times. Individual filter turbidity โ‰ค 0.1 NTU is the operational target.
Chlorine Residual (DPD Method)
Units: mg/L
Free Clโ‚‚ residual measured directly; Combined Clโ‚‚ = Total โˆ’ Free
Variables
โ€ข Free chlorine = HOCl + OClโป (measured with DPD #1)
โ€ข Total chlorine = free + combined (measured with DPD #3)
โ€ข Combined chlorine = chloramines (NHโ‚‚Cl, NHClโ‚‚, NClโ‚ƒ)
โ€ข Ontario minimum free Clโ‚‚ residual: 0.2 mg/L at all points in distribution
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
DPD #1 = 1.5 mg/L (free), DPD #3 = 2.1 mg/L (total) โ†’ Combined = 2.1 โˆ’ 1.5 = 0.6 mg/L
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
At Class 3, know the breakpoint chlorination curve: combined chlorine peaks at ~7.6:1 Clโ‚‚:NHโ‚ƒ-N ratio, then drops to zero at the breakpoint (~10:1 ratio).
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) by Evaporation
Units: mg/L
TDS (mg/L) = (Mass of residue โˆ’ Mass of dish) ร— 1,000,000 / Sample Volume (mL)
Variables
โ€ข Mass of residue = mass of dish + dried residue (mg)
โ€ข Mass of dish = tare weight (mg)
โ€ข Sample Volume = volume filtered (mL)
โ€ข Multiply by 1,000,000 to convert g/mL to mg/L
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Dish = 50.0000 g, Dish + residue = 50.0250 g, Sample = 100 mL โ†’ TDS = (25 mg) ร— 1,000,000 / 100 = 250 mg/L
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
TDS by evaporation (gravimetric) is the reference method. Conductivity-based TDS meters use a conversion factor (typically 0.5โ€“0.7 ร— conductivity in ฮผS/cm).
Hardness Calculation
Units: mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ
Total Hardness (mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ) = 2.497 ร— [Ca (mg/L)] + 4.118 ร— [Mg (mg/L)]
Variables
โ€ข Ca (mg/L) = calcium concentration
โ€ข Mg (mg/L) = magnesium concentration
โ€ข 2.497 = conversion factor for Ca (MW CaCOโ‚ƒ/MW Ca ร— 0.5 = 100/40.08 ร— 1 = 2.497)
โ€ข 4.118 = conversion factor for Mg (100/24.31 ร— 1 = 4.118)
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Ca = 80 mg/L, Mg = 20 mg/L โ†’ Hardness = (2.497 ร— 80) + (4.118 ร— 20) = 199.8 + 82.4 = 282 mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Hardness classification: 0โ€“75 mg/L = soft, 75โ€“150 = moderately hard, 150โ€“300 = hard, >300 = very hard. Ontario aesthetic objective: โ‰ค200 mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ.
Alkalinity Titration
Units: mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ) = (Volume of Hโ‚‚SOโ‚„ ร— Normality ร— 50,000) / Sample Volume (mL)
Variables
โ€ข Volume of Hโ‚‚SOโ‚„ = mL of acid used to reach pH 4.5 endpoint
โ€ข Normality = normality of Hโ‚‚SOโ‚„ titrant (typically 0.02 N)
โ€ข 50,000 = conversion factor (equivalent weight of CaCOโ‚ƒ ร— 1,000)
โ€ข Sample Volume = mL of sample
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Hโ‚‚SOโ‚„ = 8.5 mL, N = 0.02, Sample = 100 mL โ†’ Alkalinity = (8.5 ร— 0.02 ร— 50,000) / 100 = 85 mg/L as CaCOโ‚ƒ
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Alkalinity is the buffering capacity of water. Low alkalinity (<50 mg/L) makes pH control difficult during coagulation. Alkalinity is consumed by coagulant addition.
SUVA (Specific UV Absorbance)
Units: L/mgยทm
SUVA (L/mgยทm) = UVโ‚‚โ‚…โ‚„ absorbance (mโปยน) / DOC (mg/L)
Variables
โ€ข UVโ‚‚โ‚…โ‚„ = UV absorbance at 254 nm (measured in cmโปยน, then ร— 100 to convert to mโปยน)
โ€ข DOC = dissolved organic carbon (mg/L)
โ€ข SUVA > 4: high aromatic NOM, amenable to coagulation, high THM formation potential
โ€ข SUVA 2โ€“4: mixed NOM character
โ€ข SUVA < 2: low aromatic NOM, NOT amenable to coagulation, high HAA formation potential
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
UVโ‚‚โ‚…โ‚„ = 0.15 cmโปยน = 15 mโปยน, DOC = 5 mg/L โ†’ SUVA = 15/5 = 3.0 L/mgยทm (mixed NOM)
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
SUVA > 4 indicates enhanced coagulation will be effective for NOM removal and DBP control. SUVA < 2 requires alternative treatment (GAC, NF).
TOC Removal by Enhanced Coagulation
Units: %
% TOC Removal = (TOC_in โˆ’ TOC_out) / TOC_in ร— 100
Variables
โ€ข TOC_in = TOC of raw or settled water (mg/L)
โ€ข TOC_out = TOC of filtered water (mg/L)
โ€ข Enhanced coagulation target: depends on raw water TOC and SUVA
โ€ข Typical target: 25โ€“50% TOC removal by coagulation
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
TOC_in = 8 mg/L, TOC_out = 5 mg/L โ†’ % Removal = (8โˆ’5)/8 ร— 100 = 37.5%
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Ontario requires enhanced coagulation for systems with TOC > 2 mg/L and SUVA > 2. Target TOC removal depends on raw water TOC (see EPA Enhanced Coagulation guidance table).
๐Ÿ”ง

Equipment O&M

7 formulas
Pump Efficiency
Units: %
Pump Efficiency (%) = (Water Power / Shaft Power) ร— 100
Variables
โ€ข Water Power (kW) = Flow (mยณ/s) ร— Head (m) ร— ฯg / 1,000
โ€ข ฯg = 9,810 N/mยณ (specific weight of water)
โ€ข Shaft Power (kW) = power input to pump shaft
โ€ข Overall efficiency = pump efficiency ร— motor efficiency
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Flow = 0.1 mยณ/s, Head = 30 m โ†’ Water Power = 0.1 ร— 30 ร— 9,810 / 1,000 = 29.4 kW. If shaft power = 35 kW โ†’ Efficiency = 29.4/35 ร— 100 = 84%
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Pump efficiency typically 70โ€“85% for centrifugal pumps. Efficiency decreases significantly when operating far from the design point (BEP).
Specific Speed
Units: dimensionless (or rpmยทgpm^0.5/ft^0.75)
Ns = N ร— Q^0.5 / H^0.75
Variables
โ€ข N = pump speed (rpm)
โ€ข Q = flow rate (gpm or mยณ/s)
โ€ข H = total head (ft or m)
โ€ข Low Ns (500โ€“1,500): radial flow, high head, low flow
โ€ข High Ns (>5,000): axial flow, low head, high flow
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
N = 1,750 rpm, Q = 500 gpm, H = 100 ft โ†’ Ns = 1,750 ร— 500^0.5 / 100^0.75 = 1,750 ร— 22.4 / 31.6 = 1,240 (radial flow pump)
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Specific speed determines pump type. Water treatment plants typically use radial flow (centrifugal) pumps with Ns 500โ€“3,000.
Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH)
Units: m (or ft)
NPSHa = (Pa โˆ’ Pv) / ฯg + Zs โˆ’ hf
Variables
โ€ข Pa = absolute pressure at suction (m of water)
โ€ข Pv = vapour pressure of water at operating temperature (m)
โ€ข Zs = elevation of water surface above pump centreline (m, negative if below)
โ€ข hf = friction losses in suction piping (m)
โ€ข NPSHa must exceed NPSHr (required) to prevent cavitation
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Pa = 10.3 m, Pv = 0.17 m (15ยฐC), Zs = โˆ’2 m, hf = 0.5 m โ†’ NPSHa = 10.3 โˆ’ 0.17 โˆ’ 2 โˆ’ 0.5 = 7.6 m
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Cavitation occurs when NPSHa < NPSHr. Signs: noise, vibration, pitting of impeller. Prevent by: reducing suction lift, increasing suction pipe diameter, reducing flow velocity.
Affinity Laws (Variable Speed Pumps)
Units: dimensionless ratios
Qโ‚‚/Qโ‚ = Nโ‚‚/Nโ‚ | Hโ‚‚/Hโ‚ = (Nโ‚‚/Nโ‚)ยฒ | Pโ‚‚/Pโ‚ = (Nโ‚‚/Nโ‚)ยณ
Variables
โ€ข Q = flow rate (mยณ/s or gpm)
โ€ข H = total head (m or ft)
โ€ข P = power (kW or hp)
โ€ข N = pump speed (rpm)
โ€ข Subscripts 1 and 2 = original and new operating conditions
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Reduce speed from 1,750 to 1,400 rpm (ratio = 0.8): Qโ‚‚ = 0.8 ร— Qโ‚, Hโ‚‚ = 0.64 ร— Hโ‚, Pโ‚‚ = 0.51 ร— Pโ‚ (49% power reduction!)
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
VFDs (variable frequency drives) use affinity laws. Reducing speed to 80% reduces power by 49% โ€” huge energy savings for variable demand systems.
Membrane Flux
Units: L/mยฒยทh (LMH)
Flux (L/mยฒยทh) = Permeate Flow (L/h) / Membrane Area (mยฒ)
Variables
โ€ข Permeate Flow = filtered water production rate (L/h)
โ€ข Membrane Area = total active membrane area (mยฒ)
โ€ข Typical flux: MF/UF = 20โ€“80 LMH, NF/RO = 10โ€“30 LMH
โ€ข Higher flux = faster fouling, more frequent cleaning
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Permeate flow = 1,000 L/h, membrane area = 50 mยฒ โ†’ Flux = 1,000/50 = 20 LMH
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Transmembrane pressure (TMP) increases as membranes foul. When TMP reaches the cleaning threshold, chemical cleaning (CIP) is required. Track TMP vs. flux to monitor fouling.
Membrane Recovery
Units: %
Recovery (%) = Permeate Flow / Feed Flow ร— 100
Variables
โ€ข Permeate Flow = product water flow rate
โ€ข Feed Flow = total inlet flow rate
โ€ข Concentrate Flow = Feed โˆ’ Permeate
โ€ข Typical recovery: RO = 75โ€“85%, NF = 80โ€“90%, UF/MF = 90โ€“95%
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Feed = 100 mยณ/h, Permeate = 80 mยณ/h โ†’ Recovery = 80/100 ร— 100 = 80%
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Higher recovery = less concentrate waste but higher salt concentration in concentrate. Scaling risk increases at high recovery. Antiscalant dosing may be required.
Chemical Metering Pump Output
Units: L/h
Output (L/h) = Stroke Length (%) ร— Stroke Rate (strokes/min) ร— Displacement per Stroke (mL) ร— 60 / 1,000
Variables
โ€ข Stroke Length = % of maximum stroke (0โ€“100%)
โ€ข Stroke Rate = strokes per minute
โ€ข Displacement = volume per stroke at 100% stroke length (mL)
โ€ข Calibrate by measuring actual output over a timed period
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Stroke length = 75%, rate = 60 spm, displacement = 5 mL โ†’ Output = 0.75 ร— 60 ร— 5 ร— 60 / 1,000 = 13.5 L/h
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Always calibrate chemical metering pumps by measuring actual output โ€” do not rely on dial settings alone. Calibrate after any maintenance or chemical change.
๐ŸŒŠ

Source Water

5 formulas
Dilution Ratio
Units: dimensionless
Dilution Ratio = River Flow / Effluent Flow
Variables
โ€ข River Flow = upstream river flow (mยณ/s or ML/day)
โ€ข Effluent Flow = wastewater discharge flow (mยณ/s or ML/day)
โ€ข Diluted concentration = Source concentration / (Dilution Ratio + 1)
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
River flow = 15 mยณ/s, effluent = 0.3 mยณ/s โ†’ Dilution = 15/0.3 = 50:1. If effluent has 10 mg/L of a contaminant, diluted concentration = 10/51 = 0.2 mg/L
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Even at 50:1 dilution, pharmaceuticals and pathogens may be present at concentrations of concern. Source water monitoring is essential.
Reservoir Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT)
Units: days
HRT (days) = Volume (ML) / Flow (ML/day)
Variables
โ€ข Volume = reservoir storage volume (ML or mยณ)
โ€ข Flow = average daily withdrawal rate (ML/day)
โ€ข Long HRT (>30 days): algal bloom risk, thermal stratification
โ€ข Short HRT (<7 days): less treatment time, higher turbidity risk
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Volume = 5,000 ML, Flow = 50 ML/day โ†’ HRT = 5,000/50 = 100 days
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Long HRT allows algae to bloom and taste/odour compounds to accumulate. Short HRT means contamination events clear faster but treatment must respond quickly.
Trophic State Index (TSI) โ€” Carlson
Units: dimensionless (0โ€“100 scale)
TSI(Chl-a) = 9.81 ร— ln(Chl-a ฮผg/L) + 30.6
Variables
โ€ข Chl-a = chlorophyll-a concentration (ฮผg/L)
โ€ข TSI < 40: oligotrophic (clear, low nutrients)
โ€ข TSI 40โ€“50: mesotrophic
โ€ข TSI 50โ€“70: eutrophic (algal blooms possible)
โ€ข TSI > 70: hypereutrophic (severe algal blooms)
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Chl-a = 20 ฮผg/L โ†’ TSI = 9.81 ร— ln(20) + 30.6 = 9.81 ร— 3.0 + 30.6 = 60 (eutrophic)
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
TSI > 50 indicates elevated algal bloom risk. Cyanobacteria blooms and taste/odour problems are common in eutrophic reservoirs.
Secchi Depth to Turbidity (Approximate)
Units: NTU
Turbidity (NTU) โ‰ˆ 40 / Secchi Depth (m)
Variables
โ€ข Secchi Depth = depth at which a Secchi disk disappears from view (m)
โ€ข Relationship is approximate and varies with particle type
โ€ข Deeper Secchi depth = clearer water = lower turbidity
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Secchi depth = 2 m โ†’ Turbidity โ‰ˆ 40/2 = 20 NTU (approximate)
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Secchi depth is a quick field measurement of water clarity. It is NOT a substitute for turbidimeter measurement for regulatory compliance.
Phosphorus Loading
Units: kg/year
P Load (kg/year) = Concentration (mg/L) ร— Flow (mยณ/year) / 1,000
Variables
โ€ข Concentration = total phosphorus in tributary (mg/L)
โ€ข Flow = annual tributary flow (mยณ/year)
โ€ข Divide by 1,000 to convert mg to g, then g to kg
โ€ข Compare to reservoir critical loading to assess eutrophication risk
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
TP = 0.05 mg/L, Flow = 10,000,000 mยณ/year โ†’ P Load = 0.05 ร— 10,000,000 / 1,000 = 500 kg/year
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Phosphorus loading drives eutrophication. Reducing P loading from agricultural runoff, wastewater, and urban stormwater is the key to controlling algal blooms.
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Security, Safety & Admin

5 formulas
Chlorine Gas Leak Rate
Units: kg/h
Leak Rate (kg/h) = Weight Loss (kg) / Time (h)
Variables
โ€ข Weight Loss = decrease in cylinder weight (kg)
โ€ข Time = elapsed time (h)
โ€ข Maximum withdrawal rate: 1-tonne cylinder = 18 kg/h at 20ยฐC
โ€ข Exceeding max rate causes cylinder frosting and reduced output
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Cylinder weight decreased from 450 kg to 430 kg over 2 hours โ†’ Leak Rate = 20/2 = 10 kg/h
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Chlorine cylinders should be weighed daily to monitor consumption and detect leaks. Keep cylinders in a ventilated, locked room with a chlorine gas detector.
Chemical Inventory (Days of Supply)
Units: days
Days of Supply = Inventory (kg) / Daily Usage (kg/day)
Variables
โ€ข Inventory = current stock on hand (kg)
โ€ข Daily Usage = average daily consumption (kg/day)
โ€ข Minimum stock: typically 30 days supply
โ€ข Critical stock: 7 days supply triggers emergency order
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Inventory = 2,000 kg alum, Daily Usage = 450 kg/day โ†’ Days of Supply = 2,000/450 = 4.4 days (CRITICAL โ€” order immediately)
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Class 3 operators are responsible for chemical inventory management. Maintain minimum 30-day supply of critical chemicals (chlorine, coagulant, fluoride).
Dilution of Chemical Stock Solution
Units: concentration ร— volume
Cโ‚Vโ‚ = Cโ‚‚Vโ‚‚
Variables
โ€ข Cโ‚ = concentration of stock solution
โ€ข Vโ‚ = volume of stock solution to use
โ€ข Cโ‚‚ = desired concentration of diluted solution
โ€ข Vโ‚‚ = total volume of diluted solution
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Make 100 L of 1% NaOCl from 12.5% stock: Vโ‚ = (1% ร— 100 L) / 12.5% = 8 L of stock + 92 L water
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Always add acid to water (never water to acid) when diluting concentrated acids. For bleach dilution, use cool water to reduce chlorine loss.
Water Loss (Non-Revenue Water)
Units: %
Water Loss (%) = (Volume Produced โˆ’ Volume Billed) / Volume Produced ร— 100
Variables
โ€ข Volume Produced = total water treated and pumped to distribution (mยณ)
โ€ข Volume Billed = total metered water sold to customers (mยณ)
โ€ข Difference includes: real losses (leaks), apparent losses (meter error, theft)
โ€ข Target: < 10% water loss for well-maintained systems
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Produced = 10,000 mยณ/day, Billed = 8,500 mยณ/day โ†’ Loss = (10,000โˆ’8,500)/10,000 ร— 100 = 15% (above target)
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Water loss > 15% indicates significant leakage or metering problems. Pressure management, leak detection, and meter replacement are key strategies.
Energy Consumption per Volume
Units: kWh/mยณ
Energy (kWh/mยณ) = Total Energy Used (kWh) / Volume Treated (mยณ)
Variables
โ€ข Total Energy = electricity consumed by all plant equipment (kWh)
โ€ข Volume Treated = total water treated (mยณ)
โ€ข Typical range: 0.2โ€“0.5 kWh/mยณ for conventional treatment
โ€ข Membrane systems: 0.5โ€“1.5 kWh/mยณ
โ€ข RO desalination: 3โ€“5 kWh/mยณ
๐Ÿ“Š Worked Example
Energy = 5,000 kWh/day, Volume = 25,000 mยณ/day โ†’ Energy = 5,000/25,000 = 0.20 kWh/mยณ
๐Ÿ’ก Exam Tip
Energy is typically 30โ€“40% of water treatment operating costs. VFDs, off-peak pumping, and process optimization are key energy reduction strategies.